Main
Home
Shop
Invoices
Daily Thought
Index of Articles
Search Articles
Past Magazine PDFs
Book Reviews
Support Precious Seed
Links
Contact
Login





Issue
2010, Volume 65 Issue 2

Editorial
***
The Church in Revival
***
William Tyndale. England’s greatest Bible translator
***
Visit the Sick
***
Exposition of The Revelation of Jesus Christ and Prophetic Outlines
***
Simon Peter: Challenging Times
***
We're getting Married ... Help and Advise Please (2)
***
The Lord is Good
***
The Mysteries of the Kingdom of God (2)
***
Do you use Facebook?
***
Garments for Aaron
***
The Joy and Suffering of the Futherance of the Gospel (2)
***
The Independent Safeguarding Authority
***
» Vettiing and Barring - the Scottish perspective
***
Transcendent Abilities (4)
***
The Parable of the Workers in Vineyard, Matt. 20. 1-15 (3/2)
***
Brooklands, Belfast, Northern Ireland
***
Dispensationalism (4)
***
How important is the Assembly?
***
True Passion (4)
***
What God has joined together
***
Street Work
***
SAMSON - A model of Inconsistency (8/1)
***
The God who is unchanging
***
Gospel Work and other Activities
***
A Word for Today - Coming (gr. parousia)
***
Views from the News
***
Bits & Bobs
***
Question Time
***





Similar Articles

Bits & Bobs
***
Views from the News
***
Gospel Work and other Activities
***
Street Work
***
The Independent Safeguarding Authority
***
Bits & Bobs
***
More...





Article Navigation
Previous Issue
Next Volume



[One Column] [Printer Friendly]

Vettiing and Barring - the Scottish perspective

Alan Summers,Mayfield, Scotland

The regime described in the preceding article by our brother Gillham is based on the Protection of Vulnerable Groups Act 2006. It is important to appreciate that the 2006 Act applies only to England and Wales. It has no application to Scotland and limited application to Northern Ireland. The following comments are restricted to the Scottish system.

The Scottish system of child protection is presently governed by the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003. It enables background checks to be done on those whose employment brings them into contact with children. The voluntary sector is also regulated and it is for this reason that work with children by churches is caught by the Act. However, in my opinion the system is not really designed to deal with Sunday School and children’s work of the sort provided by the assemblies.

Many of those that work with children in Scotland obtain their disclosure through the Central Registered Body (CRB) which provides a free disclosure service to those who work in the voluntary sector. The application forms provided include declarations at the rear which require the signatory to state that he is ‘likely to ask exempted questions’ under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, or is ‘likely to countersign applications under the Police Act 1997’. ‘Exempted questions’ under the 1974 Act and applications under the 1997 Act are designed to find out whether a potential recruit/volunteer has any criminal convictions. The Police Act provides a mechanism for permitting employers to make background checks with the police to ensure the suitability of the applicant.

These forms are used by assemblies to disclose their Sunday School teachers or Children’s Meeting workers. I do not believe, however, that the forms are suitable. I have yet to hear of any assembly which asked ‘exempted questions’ or could truthfully say that they were ‘likely’ to apply to the police for a background check on one of their workers. Usually, those who work with children in the assemblies are so well known that there is no need for an interview process, far less a background check.1 Some might say that it is ‘possible’ that they might have to ask these questions but I don’t think anyone could say it was ‘likely’. I would guess that these forms are signed because no one has the faintest idea what an ‘exempted question’ is or what sections 113 and 115 of the Police Act 1997 are about. This is hardly surprising since the form makes no attempt to explain the meaning of the declaration although it goes on to say, ‘Warning: it is a criminal offence to make an untrue statement to help obtain a disclosure certificate’.


Top of next column

To my knowledge the CRB does not reject applications from the assemblies, however, that is probably because of ignorance of the way assemblies function. Thus, while disclosure has valuable ‘PR’ advantages, and can be used to reassure parents, I do not think the present regime can be used by the assemblies.

The law will shortly be changed. The Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 has been given royal assent. The Scottish Government website presently predicts that it will be late 2010 before it comes into force. It remains to be seen whether the new regime will cure some of the problems identified above. The greater and more general risk is that assembly work will be subject to ever increasing regulation by Government. The scope for conflict between Government committed to an equality agenda and traditional Christian values is amply attested by the present debate over the Equality Bill.

References

  1. When the author last looked, the disclosure form in use by the CRB was also inaccurate in that it contained reference to sections 113 and 115 of the Police Act 1997. Both these sections were repealed on 6 April 2006 and have been replaced. It would be a simple matter to update the form.





Enquiries: info@preciousseed.org
Site maintained by Assembly Web Services
Original Design for Precious Seed by @tracts Ltd