[All quotations are from the New King James Bible unless otherwise stated]
Consider the disciples during the incident at Caesarea Philippi, when Jesus ‘began to teach’ openly1 that He ‘must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and the scribes, and be killed’.2
Peter then ‘took Him aside [presumably, that he might not be seen to reprove the Lord in front of the other disciples] and began to rebuke Him.3 But, turning round and looking on His disciples, ‘He rebuked Peter, saying, “Get behind me, Satan”’.4 The Lord knew (i) that the other disciples shared the very same aspirations, ambitions, and hopes as Peter and (ii) that they might easily have been led astray by Peter’s remonstrance. For their benefit as much as for Peter’s, therefore, a public ‘rebuke’ was necessary.
His consideration and care shone even brighter for His mother at Golgotha. ‘When … [He] saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing [near] by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son”’.5 There were other women standing there (including Mary Magdalene and His aunt, Salome) but He had eyes for only one.
Perhaps, just for a moment, our Lord remembered the time He had entered the world through her womb … perhaps He recalled the time when she had watched Him grow up as an infant, how she had washed, clothed, and fed Him … perhaps He thought of the thirty years they had shared together in lowly Nazareth. I do not know.
But I do know that His mother had now reached an age at which, in normal circumstances, she would have looked to Him, her first-born son, for support. But, instead, she was compelled by her very love for Him to stand and witness Him suffer the humiliating and agonizing death of a condemned criminal.
Surely, He must have seen the misery written across His mother’s face as she stood there - helpless. His wounds bled, but she could do nothing to staunch the blood. His mouth was parched, but she could do nothing to moisten it. Arms which had once gently clasped her neck were outstretched out on the tree, but she was unable to caress them.
Doubtless the Saviour knew that every lash of the soldier’s scourge on His back had made her wince - that she had felt each iron spike driven through His hands and feet - that, when they twice6 stripped Him of His garments, she had felt His shame keenly - that every cruel taunt and cheap jibe flung in His teeth had wounded and stung her too.
How then, we ask reverently, did the Lord feel as, knowing all that she was suffering, from His cross He saw his mother?
When He said to Mary, ‘Woman, behold your son’, He was, in part at least, thinking of the past and was, in effect, saying His ‘farewell’, His ‘goodbye’, to her. For, as I understand them, those words marked the close of an earthly relationship which He and Mary had shared for a third of a century but which could not be taken through the grave.7 When He said to the beloved disciple, ‘Behold your mother’, He was thinking of the future and was making full provision for her.8
Sometimes what He saw displeased Him and, if necessary, He was quick to defend and shield those under attack. Consider three such incidents recorded in the Gospel according to Mark.
(i) In chapter 3 we read in the closing section of the chapter how His mother and His brothers stood outside the house ‘calling Him’.9 When informed that they were outside ‘seeking’ Him, He asked, ‘Who is my mother, or my brothers? And looking around at those sitting about Him, He said, “Behold my mother and my brothers. Whoever does the will of God, the same is my brother, and sister and mother”’.10 That was certainly a look of favour and approbation.
(ii) But earlier, as recorded in the opening section of chapter 3, He ‘looked around’ with anything but favour and approbation!
The Lord was then in a synagogue and before Him stood a man with a withered hand.11 Again, it was the Sabbath day12 and the scribes and Pharisees13 were watching Him carefully, hoping to find grounds to accuse Him of the capital offence of Sabbath violation.14The Pharisees had recently witnessed how He had previously defended His disciples when they had criticized them for plucking ears of corn on the Sabbath.15 No doubt, they were hopeful that He would now violate the Sabbath law Himself, which they understood to prohibit every act not absolutely necessary.
The glares of the scribes and Pharisees declared loudly, ‘Don’t you even think about doing anything on this day of all days!’ Unflinching, Jesus took up the challenge, called the man forward and asked them, ‘Is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?’16
‘If you have’, He was saying, ‘the power and the opportunity to do good and you do not do it, in effect, you have done evil17because, by taking no action, you become responsible for the need remaining unmet. If I have the power to heal this man’s withered hand (and I most certainly do) and I refrain from doing it, then I am as responsible for the fact that he continues to have a withered hand as if I myself had caused it to be withered in the first place’.18
‘To save life or to kill’, He added. By these words, the Lord explained that, although the man’s infirmity was not life threatening, nevertheless, in principle, all human actions (and non-actions) - no matter how small and seemingly insignificant - tend in one of two directions; the extreme in the one direction is to give life and the extreme in the other direction is to take life.
Challenged by His question, the scribes and Pharisees kept silent, refusing to answer.
‘And He looked around on them in anger, being grieved at the hardening of their heart, and He said to the man, “Stretch out your hand”’. And when he did so, his hand was restored.19 And the same eyes which had earlier swept around a group of men with favour and approbation now blazed momentarily20 around a very different group of men with anger at their unbelief and, possibly, at their refusal to answer His question.
(iii) In chapter 10, having heard the Lord’s teaching on marriage, divorce, and remarriage,21 His disciples were taken aback, concluding that, if the case was as He taught, it was better not to marry at all.22 Jesus had then spoken of those who ‘made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven’.23 In all likelihood, His disciples completely misunderstood His point, and so, when fathers24 brought their young children for Him to touch them,25the disciples were in no doubt that Jesus would have little or no time for the little children.
Certain, then, that the Lord would not want be bothered with children, His self-appointed bodyguard ‘rebuked’ those who brought them to Him.26 ‘When Jesus saw this, He was indignant27and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not prevent them, for of such is the kingdom of God”’.28 He then folded them in His strong carpenter’s arms ‘and blessed them’.29
Mark 8. 32 (παρρησίᾳ); rendered ‘plainly’, ESV. See the article, ‘παρρησίᾳ’ by Heinrich Schlier, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, volume V, pages 871-886, especially page 881.
Mark 8. 31.
Mark 8. 32.
Mark 8. 33.
John 19. 26.
Matt. 27. 28, 35.
It is quite likely that Mary and the Lord met again very soon after His death, during the ‘forty days’, when He ‘shewed himself alive’ to His disciples ‘after his passion by many proofs’, Acts 1. 3 RV. Certainly, we know that Mary was present among the 120 disciples at the ‘upper-room’ prayer meeting immediately following the Lord’s ascension, for we read that then the apostles ‘continued stedfastly in prayer, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus’, Acts 1. 13, 14 RV. Yet, even if Mary did meet the Saviour during that forty-day period, their relationship would have been very different at that time. For then she would have been simply a disciple along with the others. The Lord Jesus would then be no longer her son; on the other side of death and resurrection, He would be to her, as to all His people, a living Lord and Saviour.
John 19. 27.
Mark 3. 31.
Mark 3. 33-35 lit.
Mark 3. 1.
Mark 3. 2, 4.
Luke 6. 7.
Mark 3. 2; cp. Exod. 31. 14, 15.
Mark 2. 23-28.
Mark 3. 4.
Note, ‘to him who knows to do good, and does not do it, to him it is sin’, Jas. 4. 17.
Cp. 1 Kgs. 13. 4.
Mark 3. 5 lit.
The tenses of the Greek verbs indicate that Jesus was angry momentarily (aorist tense), but His attitude of compassion was persistent (present tense)’, Thomas Constable, Expository Notes on the Bible, e-Sword resource, comment on Mark 3. 5.
Mark 10. 2-12; cp. Matt. 19. 3-9.
Matt. 19. 10.
Matt. 19. 12 ESV.
There seems little doubt that the young children were brought by their fathers (and not, as claimed by William Hutchings in his well-known Sunday School hymn, by their mothers - from ‘Salem’ or anywhere else). The word ‘those’ in ‘his disciples rebuked those that brought them’ is masculine, both in Mark 10. 13 and in the parallel account, Matt. 19. 13. For the fathers to have brought their little ones would have been consistent with what we know of Jewish practice. Speaking of the blessing of little children in the synagogue, the ancient Jewish law stipulated, ‘After the father of the child had laid his hands on his child’s head, he brought him to the elders one by one, and they also blessed him, and prayed that he might grow up famous in the Law, faithful in marriage, and abundant in good works’, G. F. Maclear, St. Mark (Cambridge Greek Testament)’, Cambridge University Press, pg. 135. In all likelihood, therefore, it would have been the fathers who brought the babes to Jesus for Him to lay His hands on them and to ‘pray’, Matt. 19. 13. And the Lord did exactly what the synagogue elders did when fathers brought their children to them - He ‘blessed’ the babes, Mark 10. 16.
Mark 10. 13.
Mark 10. 13.
The same word (ἀγανακτέω) as is used of the ruler of the synagogue in Luke 13. 14.
Mark 10. 14 lit.
Mark 10. 16.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| elementor | never | This cookie is used by the website's WordPress theme. It allows the website owner to implement or change the website's content in real-time. |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |